MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066510031 · doi:10.4000/ahrf.11262

De la guerre de Sept ans aux révolutions : regards sur les relations internationales

2007· article· fr· W2066510031 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Bélissa, Edmond Dziembowski, Jean-Yves Guiomar

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique FrançaiseCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

partir de la fin de l'anne 1789, l'occasion des dbats de porte internationale prsents l'Assemble, la plupart des Constituants rejettent les pratiques et les conceptions diplomatiques de l'Ancien Rgime, sans ncessairement concrtiser tous leurs engagements. Comme dans l'ordre politique, les dputs adoptent un discours de rupture qui cache mal la ncessaire transaction entre l'hritage et la nouveaut ; au-del d'invitables divisions entre patriotes, qui portent notamment sur la nature de la socit des nations , l'Assemble dnonce les guerres entreprises dans l'intention de faire des conqutes, proclame le droit des peuples disposer de leur sort et rejette les traits et les pratiques traditionnelles de la ngociation diplomatique. Comme bientt certains caractres de la guerre rvolutionnaire, ces volutions s'inscrivent dans un processus historique que les contemporains n'ont pas toujours peru ; dans le domaine de l'histoire des relations internationales, c'est peut-tre ce lien avec le pass qui a le plus nourri et enrichi les rflexions de ces dernires annes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicEuropean Political History AnalysisFrench-language works237,207