MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066510031 · doi:10.4000/ahrf.11262

De la guerre de Sept ans aux révolutions : regards sur les relations internationales

2007· article· fr· W2066510031 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique FrançaiseCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

partir de la fin de l'anne 1789, l'occasion des dbats de porte internationale prsents l'Assemble, la plupart des Constituants rejettent les pratiques et les conceptions diplomatiques de l'Ancien Rgime, sans ncessairement concrtiser tous leurs engagements. Comme dans l'ordre politique, les dputs adoptent un discours de rupture qui cache mal la ncessaire transaction entre l'hritage et la nouveaut ; au-del d'invitables divisions entre patriotes, qui portent notamment sur la nature de la socit des nations , l'Assemble dnonce les guerres entreprises dans l'intention de faire des conqutes, proclame le droit des peuples disposer de leur sort et rejette les traits et les pratiques traditionnelles de la ngociation diplomatique. Comme bientt certains caractres de la guerre rvolutionnaire, ces volutions s'inscrivent dans un processus historique que les contemporains n'ont pas toujours peru ; dans le domaine de l'histoire des relations internationales, c'est peut-tre ce lien avec le pass qui a le plus nourri et enrichi les rflexions de ces dernires annes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it