Bose-glass to superfluid transition in the three-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a Monte Carlo study of the Bose glass to superfluid transition in the three-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model. Simulations are performed on the classical $(3+1)$ dimensional link-current representation using the geometrical worm algorithm. Finite-size scaling analysis (on lattices as large as $16\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}16\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}16\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}512$ sites) of the superfluid stiffness and the compressibility is consistent with a value of the dynamical critical exponent $z=3$, in agreement with existing scaling and renormalization group arguments that $z=d$. We find also a value of $\ensuremath{\nu}=0.70(12)$ for the correlation length exponent, satisfying the relation $\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\ge}2∕d$. However, a detailed study of the correlation functions, $C(r,\ensuremath{\tau})$, at the quantum critical point are not consistent with this value of $z$. We speculate that this discrepancy could be due to the fact that the correlation functions have not reached their true asymptotic behavior because of the relatively small spatial extent of the lattices used in the present study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".