Assessing coparenting in families of school-age children: Validation of the Coparenting and Family Rating System.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study aimed to expand research on coparenting to include families of school-age children by investigating the psychometric properties of an observational coparent- ing measure, and by examining relations between copar- enting and child adjustment in this population. Participants included 67 couples and a first-born, 7- to 11- year-old child. Family interactions were coded with the Coparenting and Family Rating System (CFRS; McHale, Kuersten-Hogan, & Lauretti, 2000). For boys, Hostility- Competitiveness (i.e., coparental competition, coparental verbal sparring, and child-centredness) correlated with anxiety on the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (Reynolds & Richmond, 1978) and with mother-reported Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total Problems on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach, 1991a). For girls, Parenting Discrepancy (i.e., mother-father differ- ences in parent-child warmth and investment) correlated with mother-reported CBCL Internalizing. Results demon- strate the utility of the CFRS with school-age children and suggest that coparenting-adjustment linkages may differ by child gender. R6sum6 Cette 6tude avait pour but d'61argir la recherche sur la coparentalit6 en tenant compte de familles d'enfants d'age scolaire lorsqu'on examine les caract6ristiques psy- chom6triques de la mesure d'observation de la coparentalit6 et lorsqu'on 6tudie les relations qui pr6va- lent, dans cette population, entre coparentalit6 et adapta- tion des enfants. On comptait parmi les participants 67 couples et les premiers n6s de la famille ag6s de 7 h 11 ans. Les interactions familiales ont 6t6 cod6es h l'aide du
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".