MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066560376 · doi:10.1080/00032710802418893

Activity of Lambda-Exonuclease on Surface-Attached Oligonucleotide Detected by Acoustic Wave Device and Radiochemical Labeling

2008· article· en· W2066560376 on OpenAlexaffabout
L. Michelle Furtado, Michael Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryOligonucleotideExonucleaseSurface acoustic waveBiotinylationDNAAnalytical Chemistry (journal)BiochemistryChromatographyAcousticsPhysicsDNA polymerase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Single-strand 25-mer oligonucleotides have been attached to the surface of a 9-MHz acoustic wave sensor incorporated into a flow-through configuration. This was achieved by an online interaction of the biotinylated probe with chemisorbed neutravidin. Duplex formation with complementary 25-mer was monitored by acoustic wave detection in real time. Regeneration of the probe-modified surface was achieved using online introduction of λ-exonuclease, an enzyme that digests a single strand of double-stranded DNA beginning with the 5′ end, cleaving single nucleotides as it progresses. Thus, with the 5′ end of the probe strand remaining inaccessible because of the biotin-neutravidin linkage, the target strand was successfully removed by enzymatic digestion. The results of the acoustic wave work are correlated with analogous experiments involving oligonucleotides labeled with 32P. Keywords: Acoustic wave devicebiosensors λ-exonucleaseflow-through formatnucleic acid 32P labelingsensor regeneration The authors are grateful to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for support of this work. Also, we thank Jon Ellis of the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering of the University of Toronto for very helpful discussions regarding the physics of acoustic wave propagation and assistance in the preparation of the manuscript. Notes Note. Additions of labeled F2 are given in bold type. a Labeled F2 is designated F2∗. Conditions are A: F2 (39 pmol), exo (90 min); B: F2 (735 pmol), exo (90 min); C: F2 (750 pmol), exo (15 min); D: F2 (1490 pmol), exo (15) min.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical LettersSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207