Effects of Microencapsulated Phase Change Materials Granularity and Heat Treat Treatment Condition on the Structure and Performance of Polyurethane Foams
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, we study on the effect of different congregated granularities of microencapsulated n-octadecane on polyurethane foamed system, and the making of the polyurethane foams with high contents of microencapsulated n-octadecane. The results show that, when relative low granularities of microencapsulated phase change materials (MicroPCMs) are used as additives, the remnant water and formaldehyde have adverse effects on the foam, so the MicroPCMs should better be heat-treated which is helpful for removing the residual, and more uniform foam can be obtained when relative low granularities of MicroPCMs are used. The polyurethane foams with maximum contents of 28 parts of n-octadecane can be made when the polyethylene glycol-400 (PEG-400) is interfused in the foamed system to regulate the viscosity of the system. The formed foams absorb heat at about 27? and dissipate heat at about 25?, which heat storage is bigger than 18J/g and can be used as thermal insulation materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".