Comparative Studies of Prolactin Secretion in Estradiol-Primed and Normal Male Rats Induced by Ether Stress, Pimozide and TRH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The differences in plasma prolactin concentration between normal and estradiol-implanted male rats were compared after treatment with 3 different stimulating agents of prolactin secretion [ether anesthesia, pimozide (a "specific' dopaminergic receptor blocking agent) and TRH] using conscious, free-moving rats implanted with permanent intra-atrial cannulae. It has recently been shown that ether stress raises the circulating prolactin concentration by stimulating PRF secretion. The ether stress elevated prolactin concentration from 100 to 400 ng/ml in the estradiol-implanted rat and from 10 to 40 ng/ml in the normal male. Thus, the ether stress elevated the prolactin concentration 4 times over the basal level in both normal male and estradiol-implanted male rats, implying that the physiological role of the PRF is not changed by the estradiol implantation. A bolus injection of pimozide (1 mg/kg) elevated the plasma prolactin concentration in both the normal and estradiol-implanted male with an initial surge followed by descent to a maintained plateau level. This plateau level in the estradiol-primed rat was 600 ng/ml and in the nonprimed male rat, 50 ng/ml. The ratio of the plateau concentration over the basal level was 4 times for both groups, suggesting that the physiological role of the PIF in the estradiol-implanted rat is not different from that in the normal male rat. It is known that TRH not only stimulates TSH secretion but will stimulate prolactin secretion as well. A very large dose (0.6 mg/kg) of TRH elevated prolactin concentration 6-fold in the estradiol-implanted rat but stimulate little prolactin secretion in the normal male rat. Since ether exposure appears to stimulate prolactin secretion in both estradiol-primed and non-primed male rats through PRF secretion, while TRH was not able to stimulate a significant amount of prolactin secretion in the normal male rat, we concluded that TRH acts to stimulate prolactin secretion in estradiol-primed rats but through a different mechanism than that operating for PRF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".