MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066674508 · doi:10.5589/m02-065

Landsat-7 ETM+ orthoimage coverage of Canada

2002· article· en· W2066674508 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsOrthophotoGeographyRemote sensingCartographyPhysical geographyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThe Centre for Topographic Information (CTI) of Natural Resources Canada is currently producing a complete set of cloud-free orthoimages covering the Canadian land mass using data from the Landsat-7 satellite (under a project called Ortho-7). The project is being undertaken in partnership with GeoConnections, the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS), provincial and territorial agencies, and other federal government departments. In addition to financial support, partners are providing topographic control data to assist in producing orthoimages of high quality and accuracy. The creation of a national coverage with Landsat-7 orthoimages will provide an up-to-date fundamental geospatial framework for Canada. These products will serve as an excellent reference for map updating, and their geometric integrity will facilitate data integration from other map and image sources. The inherent information content of the imagery will also serve as a rich baseline for characterizing the Canadian land mass. Image acquisition for this initiative began in 1999 and will continue until complete coverage of Canada is obtained (scheduled for completion in 2004). Of the estimated 750 scenes required to cover the Canadian land mass, 400 images have already been identified as suitable for production. The primary criterion is that the imagery must be cloud and haze free. The ortho-correction is being done in partnership with Canadian industry and is proceeding as scheduled. This note is intended to provide details about the Landsat-7 orthoimage data specifications, production, and delivery model.Le Centre d'information topographique (CIT) produit actuellement une couverture d'ortho-images pour l'ensemble du territoire canadien à partir du satellite Landsat-7. Ce projet est rendu possible grâce à la participation de GeoConnexions, du Centre canadien de télédétection (CCT), de la grande majorité des gouvernements provinciaux et territoriaux ainsi que des autres ministères fédéraux intéressés à la géomatique. En plus de leur participation financière, les organismes possédant des données de contrôle sont invités à les fournir afin de produire des ortho-images les plus précises possible. Par la création d'une couverture nationale d'ortho-images produite à partir des données de contrôle des divers partenaires, le présent projet mettra sur pied une structure nationale d'informations géographiques qui permettra d'intégrer diverses données provenant de différentes organisations. La participation des provinces et des autres partenaires dans le projet contribue à rencontrer les objectifs de GéoConnexions, soit l'établissement d'une structure géospatiale commune favorisant l'intégration de données et l'élaboration d'applications. L'acquisition des images a débuté à l'été 1999 et se poursuivra jusqu'à l'obtention d'une couverture complète du territoire canadien (prévue pour 2004). Parmi les 750 scènes Landsat-7 requises, plus de 400 sont déjà disponibles pour la production des ortho-images. Les scènes choisies doivent être sans nuage ni voile atmosphérique. Une grande partie des fonds investis dans ce projet sont redistribués sous forme de contrats à l'industrie canadienne de la géomatique. Cet article présente le processus de production, les spécifications techniques des données produites et le modèle de partenariat établi pour le projet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it