Effect of High Temperature Microwave Thickened Waste-Activated Sludge Pretreatment on Distribution and Digestion of Soluble Organic Matter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microwave (MW) pretreatment is a recent method used for anaerobic sludge stabilization. Most of the studies focus on MW pretreatment at temperatures lower than boiling point of sludge and limited information on high temperature MW irradiation as pretreatment method is known. This work focused on the effect on high temperature (110–175°C) MW irradiation on biodegradation pathway of soluble organics. Microwave pretreatment at different operating conditions was applied to municipal waste-activated sludge. Ultrafiltration was used to determine the molecular weight (Mw) distribution of soluble organics. Effects of MW pretreatment temperature (110 and 175°C) and MW intensity (1.25 and 3.75°C/min) on biodegradability and rate of degradation were compared to an untreated sample. It was observed that solubilization increased as MW temperature increased. Although lowering MW intensity did not show significant improvement in overall solubility, Mw distribution profiles were found to be very different, confirming that MW intensity has an impact on thickened waste activated sludge solubilization at the molecular level. The overall (Mw < 5 μm) biodegradable chemical oxygen demand (COD)/refractory COD ratio increased with the combination of athermal effect of low MW intensity combined with the thermal effect of high pretreatment temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".