Copper and health status of cattle grazing high-molybdenum forage from a reclaimed mine tailing site
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High concentrations (21–44 mg kg -1 dry matter) of Mo have been identified in forage in several reclaimed mining areas in British Columbia. Since Mo concentrations greater than 5 mg kg -1 in forage dry matter may result in molybdenosis because of a secondary Cu deficiency in ruminants, a study was undertaken to determine if cattle can safely graze the reclaimed land. For 12-wk grazing periods in 1994, 1995 and 1996, 32 cow/calf pairs grazed high-Mo forage at a reclaimed mine tailings site located at the Highland Valley Copper mine near Logan lake, BC. Half of the animals in the trial received a Cu supplement (All-Trace copper bolus) and the other half served as a control group. There were no significant differences (P < 0.05) in weight gain, liver Mo, serum Cu and Mo, and milk Cu and Mo between the two treatment groups of cows. Liver Cu was higher for the Cu bolus group at certain time periods in 1994 and 1995, indicating that the bolus was effective at supplying Cu. At all times, the liver Cu levels for the animals remained above the recommended critical level of 25 mg kg -1 dry matter. Animals appeared healthy and no signs of Cu deficiency were observed. Key words: Molybdenum, molybdenosis, copper, mine tailings, reclamation, animal health
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".