Induction of Cyclo-oxygenase-2 Expression in Naturally Occurring Gastric Ulcers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) is believed to participate in the repair of gastric ulcer. Like humans, pigs frequently develop gastric ulcers and thus represent an attractive animal model in which to study the repair process of naturally occurring gastric ulcers. However, expression of COX in the pig stomach has not been reported. The objectives of this study were to determine whether COX isoenzymes are expressed in porcine gastric ulcers and to characterize the porcine COX-2 cDNA. Normal stomachs (n=5) and those with gastric ulcers (n=35) were studied by immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting analysis. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to isolate the complete porcine COX-2 cDNA. COX-1 staining was present in normal stomach and in ulcerated areas. No COX-2 was detected in normal stomach, but COX-2 was strongly expressed in the ulcerated area in 28/35 (80%) gastric ulcers (p<0.01). Immunoblotting analysis confirmed the restricted expression of COX-2 in the ulcerated areas. The porcine COX-2 cDNA was shown to code for a 604 amino acid protein that is 89% identical to human COX-2. These results provide the complete primary structure of porcine COX-2 and demonstrate for the first time that the enzyme is induced in naturally occurring porcine gastric ulcers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".