MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066808497 · doi:10.1117/12.913082

XPS study of InP/InGaAs/InGaAsP microstructures irradiated with ArF laser in air and deionized water

2012· article· en· W2066808497 on OpenAlexaff
Neng Liu, Khalid Moumanis, Sonia Blais, Jan J. Dubowski

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsExcimer laserLaserX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyQuantum wellMicrostructureAnnealing (glass)Gallium arsenideIndium gallium arsenideIrradiationMicroelectronicsOpticsChemical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excimer lasers, due to their compatibility with a large-scale industrial production, are attractive tools for precise processing of photonic and microelectronic materials. In this article, we discuss the effect of ArF excimer laser defect formation on the surface of InP/InGaAs/InGaAsP quantum well (QW) microstructures irradiated in air and deionized (DI) water environments. Structural defects on surfaces of such QW materials have been known to induce vacancy diffusion towards the QW region and lead to the so called quantum well intermixing (QWI) effect during the rapid thermal annealing step. Excimer lasers have been used to create surface defects on InP/InGaAs/InGaAsP microstructure and induce QWI during high temperature annealing. Chemical composition of the QW microstructures irradiated with ArF laser in air and DI water is studied with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to investigate both the formation and role of the surface defects in the laser-induced QWI process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207