Executive Dysfunction in Patients With Cerebral Hypoperfusion After Cerebral Angiostenosis/Occlusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Impairment of executive functions (EFs) was investigated in patients with cerebral hypoperfusion after cerebral angiostenosis/occlusion. Several EFs were measured in patients with cerebral angiostenosis/occlusion and healthy subjects. The vascular conditions, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV), mean transit time (MTT), time to peak (TTP), and delay time were assessed. The scores of the vascular stenosis/occlusion group were significantly lower than those of the control group. rCBV and rCBF were negatively correlated with the error response times in the Stroop test, and the persistent error responses in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) were positively correlated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. TTP was positively correlated with the reaction and error reaction times, and the persistent error response in WCST was negatively correlated with the times of sorting in WCST and MoCA scores. MTT was positively correlated with the persistent error response in WCST. In the Stroop test, delay time was positively correlated with response time, and negatively correlated with error response times, and the persistent error response in WCST and MoCA scores. Patients with cerebral hypoperfusion after cerebral angiostenosis/occlusion had executive dysfunctions in working memory, sustained attention, response inhibition, cognitive flexibility, thought organization, planning, and implementation. Moreover, their executive dysfunctions were related with the decline in rCBF and rCBV. The prolonged TTP, MTT, and delay time suggested a slow blood flow and the poor compensation of collateral circulation, resulting in impairment of the EFs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".