MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066882858 · doi:10.1587/elex.11.20140952

High efficiency GaN HEMT class-F synchronous rectifier for wireless applications

2014· article· en· W2066882858 on OpenAlexafffund
Sadegh Abbasian, Thomas Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueIEICE Electronics Express · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKeysight Technologies
KeywordsAmplifierRectifier (neural networks)Precision rectifierRF power amplifierElectrical engineeringPower-added efficiencyWireless power transferDirect-coupled amplifierLinear amplifierElectronic engineeringPhysicsPower factorComputer scienceOperational amplifierEngineeringVoltageCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, experimental results are shown for a synchronous class-F RF to DC rectifier. The rectifier design is obtained by transforming a class-F amplifier into a rectifier using the theory of time reversal duality. The amplifier and rectifier are tested under identical source power conditions to demonstrate the duality between the circuits. A 10 W Cree HEMT device is used in the designs at a frequency of 985 MHz. The class-F amplifier delivers 8.3 W with an efficiency of 77.5% for a DC source power of 10.7 W. The time reversed dual, a class-F rectifier, delivers 8.7 W of DC load power for a RF input source power of 10.7 W with an efficiency of 81.3%. The rectifier circuit has slightly higher efficiency than the amplifier and lower losses in the rectifier are attributed to device operation in both quadrants I and III compared to an amplifier which operates exclusively in quadrant I. The rectifier has a peak output power of 11.3 W with an efficiency of 78% and this is the highest reported power for a synchronous RF class-F amplifier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEICE Electronics ExpressSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207