MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066970245 · doi:10.1071/rdv22n1ab132

132 INDUCTION OF FIRST POSTPARTUM OVULATION AFTER ADMINISTRATION OF GnRH, ESTRADIOL BENZOATE, OR LH ASSOCIATED OR NOT WITH CALF REMOVAL IN NELORE COWS

2009· article· en· W2066970245 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. G. Pinheiro, Ana Carolina Santos Oliveira, José Cury, C. M. Barros

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstradiol benzoateOvulationAnimal scienceBreedEndocrinologyInternal medicineHormoneBeef cattleMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are reports in the literature indicating that the presence of calf, body condition score, energy balance, number of births (multiparous v. primiparous), and breed are factors that influence the duration of postpartum anoestrus in beef cows. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate, during early postpartum, the time necessary for reestablishment of pituitary LH stocks, determined by the hypothalamic-pituitary axis responsiveness to exogenous administration of GnRH and estradiol benzoate (EB). Multiparous lactating Nelore cows (n = 51) were kept in Brachiaria brizantha pasture. The animals were randomly allocated in 8 groups, according to the hormonal treatment: EB Group (1.0 mg of EB, i.m. Estrogin®, Farmavet, Sao Paulo, Brazil; n = 7), EB and calf removal (CR) group (EB/CR, calves were removed at the time of birth, n = 4), EB/SUP group (cows were supplemented with a balanced diet, based on cotton meal and ground corn, from the beginning of the experiment until ovulation), GnRH group (100 µg, licereline, i.m. Gestran Plus®, ARSA SLR, Buenos Aires, Argentina; n = 7), GnRH/CR group (n = 4), GnRH/SUP group (n = 8), LH group (12.5 mg, i.m. Lutropin® Bioniche, Ontario, Canada; n = 7), and control group (did not receive any hormone to induce ovulation or diet supplementation, n = 5).The hormones were administered weekly, from 7 days postpartum (±5 days) until the occurrence of the first ovulation, which was determined by the presence of CL during weekly ovarian ultrasonography (Aloka 900, Tokyo, Japan, 7.5 MHz probe). The data were analyzed by ANOVA. On average (±SEM) the first ovulation occurred 86.7 ± 0.5 (EB); 19.7 ± 0.6 (EB/CR); 57.8 ± 0.4 (EB/SUP); 44.7 ± 0.5 (GnRH); 25.9 ± 0.6 (GnRH/CR); 32.8 ± 0.4 (GnRB/SUP); 42.4 ± 0.5 (LH); and 59.3 ± 0.5 (control) days postpartum. There were significant differences between groups: EB v. EB/SUP (P < 0.01), EB v. EB/CR (P < 0.01), EB v. control (P < 0.04), EB v. GnRH (P = 0.01), and there was a tendency between groups: GnRH v. GnRH-SUP (P = 0.10) and LH v. control (P = 0.10). The first ovulations were detected from the second week postpartum (animals from Groups GnRH and EB/CR) until the last ultrasound examination on Day 120 postpartum (Group EB). The results indicate that from the second week postpartum there is sufficient LH in the pituitary to induce ovulation after GnRH or EB administration. However, the cows from EB group ovulated later than animals from the other groups, possibly due to the sensitivity of hypothalamus to negative feedback of estrogens, inhibiting the pre-ovulatory LH surge. Additionally, calf removal and food supplementation reduced in 2 to 4 weeks the time of the first postpartum ovulation induced by GnRH or EB. Fellowship from FAPESP. Supported from FAPESP (Sao Paulo, Brazil).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207