MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Increased expression of the adipokine genes resistin and fasting-induced adipose factor in hypoxic/ischaemic mouse brain

2006· article· en· W2066970729 on OpenAlexaff
Glen Wiesner, Russell E. Brown, George S. Robertson, Syed Ali Imran, Ehud Ur, Michael Wilkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreNova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistinAdipokineAdipose tissueInternal medicineEndocrinologyHypoxia (environmental)IschemiaMedicineBiologyInsulin resistanceObesityChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adipose tissue is the primary source of the adipokines resistin and fasting-induced adipose factor (FIAF). We reported that the brain is also a site of adipokine expression, although their function there is unknown. Peripheral resistin and fasting-induced adipose factor are reported to be inflammatory markers, and we hypothesized that they would be induced in the brain by hypoxia/ischaemia. We show that neonatal hypoxia/ischaemia rapidly increased fiaf mRNA in the injured cortex and hippocampus at 2 and 7 days after hypoxia/ischaemia. In contrast, resistin (retn) mRNA was increased in the cortex only at 21 days after hypoxia/ischaemia. As a lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response did not increase brain fiaf and retn mRNA levels, we conclude that brain injury may be responsible for the novel hypoxia/ischaemia-induced changes in adipokine gene expression. In summary, our results indicate that brain injury, or an inflammatory stimulus, regulates the central expression of two genes normally considered to be adipose tissue-specific. These observations add to our previous evidence that the brain is an important site of adipokine gene expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesFrench-language works237,207