Charge state breeding applications with the ECR PHOENIX source: From low to high current production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) charge state breeding method based on the PHOENIX source is first dedicated to the continuous high charge state radioactive ion production for cyclotrons, due to their q/m requirements, and to the high charge state production efficiency. It can be used as an injector for RFQ, linacs, and synchrotrons either in cw or pulsed operation. The efficiency of the 1+ to the n+ ion production and the charge breeding time are the fundamental parameters of the method, their dependence with regard to the 1+ ion beam emittance injected has been measured and will be discussed with regard to the radioactive ion beam acceleration. The efficiency of the process slightly decreases when injecting ion beam emittances higher than 30 π mm mrad, and remains constant in the 1+ radioactive intensity range available today and in the future. The ECR ion trap tuning associated with the afterglow mode permits the ionization, the accumulation, and the extraction of the injected primary beam keeping interesting efficiencies suitable to pulsed accelerators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".