Early regeneration conifer identification and competition cover assessment using airborne digital camera imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential of low cost, high-resolution airborne digital camera imagery for use in early stage forest regeneration assessment was investigated. Airborne imagery with 2.5-cm pixel size was acquired near Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, over a forest vegetation management research site to: i) evaluate capabilities for identification and stem counting of two-year old conifer crop species under leaf-off and leaf-on conditions using classification of spectral and textural image information, and ii) develop models relating vegetation cover parameters to image spectral and texture information. Results indicate strong potential for identification and counting of conifer trees when competing vegetation cover is low or in leaf-off condition. However, systematic decreases in class separability and conifer count accuracy were observed with increasing competition. In image modelling of competition Leaf Area Index and Cover, statistically significant relations were found using primarily spectral measures. Stratification by competition species improved model fits and included texture measures in some models. Key words: airborne remote sensing, forest vegetation management, regeneration, digital cameras, leaf area index, cover, tree classification
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".