MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067035982 · doi:10.1260/0309-524x.36.6.717

Experimental Indirect Determination of Wind Turbine Performance and Blade Element Theory Parameters in Controlled Conditions

2012· article· en· W2067035982 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueWind Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Renewable Energy LaboratoryOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsBlade element momentum theoryTurbineNacelleWakeMechanicsBlade element theoryRotor (electric)Chord (peer-to-peer)AirfoilTurbine bladeReynolds numberStructural engineeringMarine engineeringPhysicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringTurbulenceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of a three bladed 3.3 m diameter turbine was measured unobtrusively in a large scale, controlled wind, open jet facility. Due to the scale of the facility blockage was very low in comparison to previous studies. The turbine blades utilized NREL S83X airfoils appropriate for the flow conditions and Reynolds number present in the facility. Airfoils were blended along the radial direction in a varying chord, varying twist blade design with a design coefficient of power ( C p ) peak at λ = 5.4. Simultaneous three component velocity measurements were obtained using a purpose built traverse at specific radial locations (segments) upstream and immediately downstream of the rotor plane. These velocities were utilized to determine blade element momentum (BEM) parameters and to predict the performance of the rotor. Comparisons are made to the limited number of experimental studies reported in the literature and with parameters derived from CFD numerical simulations. Measured radial velocities upstream of the rotor were near zero and uniform in the radial direction and were uniform and slightly larger downstream of the rotor indicating the BEM assumption of limited radial interaction between segments was acceptable and that the wake was expanding. Axial induction was most uniform in the radial direction at the design and peak C p condition and area averaged values approached 1/3 but did not exceed this value. Tangential measured velocities, tangential induction and circulation show the impact of the nacelle and blade root location and the tip. An evaluation of the local angle of attack and two dimensional airfoil data at one radial location gave a reasonable comparison with other measured torque values. Rotor performance determined with this method was compared with electrical power measurements and previous BEM model predictions. The power derived from the BEM method outlined here closely followed electrical turbine power measurements although the method overpredicted the power likely due to the segment discretization in the tip region. The detail of these results should be useful to further understand the flow immediately downstream of a rotor in controlled conditions and provide detailed data for BEM model enhancement and future model development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it