Experimental Indirect Determination of Wind Turbine Performance and Blade Element Theory Parameters in Controlled Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performance of a three bladed 3.3 m diameter turbine was measured unobtrusively in a large scale, controlled wind, open jet facility. Due to the scale of the facility blockage was very low in comparison to previous studies. The turbine blades utilized NREL S83X airfoils appropriate for the flow conditions and Reynolds number present in the facility. Airfoils were blended along the radial direction in a varying chord, varying twist blade design with a design coefficient of power ( Cp) peak at λ = 5.4. Simultaneous three component velocity measurements were obtained using a purpose built traverse at specific radial locations (segments) upstream and immediately downstream of the rotor plane. These velocities were utilized to determine blade element momentum (BEM) parameters and to predict the performance of the rotor. Comparisons are made to the limited number of experimental studies reported in the literature and with parameters derived from CFD numerical simulations. Measured radial velocities upstream of the rotor were near zero and uniform in the radial direction and were uniform and slightly larger downstream of the rotor indicating the BEM assumption of limited radial interaction between segments was acceptable and that the wake was expanding. Axial induction was most uniform in the radial direction at the design and peak Cp condition and area averaged values approached 1/3 but did not exceed this value. Tangential measured velocities, tangential induction and circulation show the impact of the nacelle and blade root location and the tip. An evaluation of the local angle of attack and two dimensional airfoil data at one radial location gave a reasonable comparison with other measured torque values. Rotor performance determined with this method was compared with electrical power measurements and previous BEM model predictions. The power derived from the BEM method outlined here closely followed electrical turbine power measurements although the method overpredicted the power likely due to the segment discretization in the tip region. The detail of these results should be useful to further understand the flow immediately downstream of a rotor in controlled conditions and provide detailed data for BEM model enhancement and future model development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".