MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067081851 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2012.6551160

Characterization of the eLine ASICs in prototype detector systems for LCLS

2012· article· en· W2067081851 on OpenAlexaff
G. Carini, A. Dragone, Benoît-Louis Bérubé, P. Caragiulo, David Fritz, Philip Hart, Ryan Herbst, S. Herrmann, C. Kenney, A. Kuczewski, H. Lemke, J. Mead, J. Pines, A. Robert, D. P. Siddons, Diling Zhu, G. Haller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDetectorApplication-specific integrated circuitDynamic rangePhoton countingPixelFull width at half maximumNoise (video)High dynamic rangeOpticsComputer scienceComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"eLine", a class of multichannel time-variant integrating front-end Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), has been completed at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory for applications at the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS). The class, designed for pixelated sensors with column-parallel readout, is composed of two front-end ASICs: one designed for high-dynamic range applications (eLine10k) and one designed for ultra-low noise applications (eLine100). The first allows large input full-scale signals, on the order of 1048keV photons, with a resolution of half a photon FWHM; while the second provides low noise charge integration, up to a full-scale signal of 100 8keV photons, with an equivalent noise charge (ENC) of 55e- r.m.s. Three different prototype systems utilizing the ASICs are described. The first is a 32k-pixel X-ray Active Matrix Pixel Sensor (XAMPS) detector developed at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) for the X-ray Pump Probe instrument (XPP) at LCLS. The XAMPS are monolithic detectors with fast-frame readout and large full-scale signal. In particular, they provide a full well capacity on the order of 1048keV photons per pixel and a resolution of half a photon FWHM. The second prototype, developed around eLine10k, is a beam finder with high dynamic range. The third prototype is developed around eLine100 to be used as detector in a spectrometer. Applications, test results and performance are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207