Effects of acid-induced esophagitis on esophageal smooth muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acid-induced esophagitis is associated with sustained longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) contraction and consequent esophageal shortening. In addition, LSM strips from opossums with esophagitis are hyper-responsive, while the circular smooth muscle (CSM) contractility is impaired. To determine the origin of these changes, studies were performed on esophageal smooth muscle cells isolated from opossum esophagi perfused intraluminally on 3 consecutive days with either saline (control; n = 8) or HCl (n = 9). CSM and LSM cells, obtained by enzymatic digestion, were exposed to various concentrations of carbachol (CCh) and fixed. CCh induced concentration-dependent contraction of both LSM and CSM cells. CCh-induced LSM cell contraction was not different between control and esophagitis animals; however, there was marked attenuation in the CCh-induced contraction of CSM cells from esophagitis animals. Morphological studies revealed significant hypertrophy of the CSM cells. These findings suggest that impaired CSM contractility can be attributed at least in part to alterations to the CSM cell itself. In contrast, hyper-contractility demonstrated in LSM strips is likely related to factors in the surrounding tissue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".