The Effect of Steric Hindrance on the Association of Telluradiazoles through Te−N Secondary Bonding Interactions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DFT calculations were used to compare the magnitude of steric repulsion to the strength of secondary bonding interactions (SBIs) in the (Te−N) 2 supramolecular synthon to explain or predict the supramolecular structures assembled by two derivatives of the 1,2,5-telluradiazole ring: benzo-2,1,3-telluradiazole ( 4c ) and 3,6-dibromobenzo-2,1,3-telluradiazole ( 5 ). The crystallographically determined structures were consistent with the computational predictions. In sharp contrast with the previously known structures of its sulfur and selenium analogues, 4c forms infinite ribbon chains in the solid state with 2.682(7)−2.720(7) Å Te−N SBIs. Steric hindrance in 5 restricted the supramolecular association to form discrete dimers with 2.697(8) Å Te−N SBIs. In addition to discrete dimers, the dibromo derivative crystallizes as solvated dimers in 5 ·DMSO with 2.834(5) Å Te−O SBIs. Other weaker SBIs were identified in the crystal lattices and were assessed by the computational method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it