MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067147929 · doi:10.1021/la030145u

In Situ Study of Colloid Crystallization in Constrained Geometry

2003· article· en· W2067147929 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColloidMaterials scienceCrystallizationColloidal crystalChemical physicsElectrical conductorGroove (engineering)DielectricElectrodeCrystallographyNanotechnologyChemistryComposite materialOptoelectronicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We visualized in real time electrodeposition-driven colloid crystal growth on patterned conductive surfaces. The electrode was patterned with dielectric ribs and conductive grooves; the groove width was commensurate or incommensurate with a two-dimensional colloid crystal lattice. Electrodeposition was carried out against gravity to decouple sedimentation and electrodeposition of colloid particles. Our experiments reveal the following: (i) Colloid crystal growth occurs under the action of electrohydrodynamic forces, in contrast with colloid assembly under the action of capillary forces. (ii) Confinement of the colloid arrays reduces the size of particle clusters. Small clusters easily undergo structural rearrangements to produce close-packed crystals when the groove width is commensurate or nearly commensurate with the 2D lattice. (iii) Incommensurability between the two-dimensional crystalline lattice and the groove width exceeding ca. 15% leads to the formation of non-close-packed structures and the distortion of colloid arrays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it