MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067172197 · doi:10.5555/1070432.1070561

Finding the shortest bottleneck edge in a parametric minimum spanning tree

2005· article· en· W2067172197 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy M. Chan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanning treeMinimum spanning treeCombinatoricsMathematicsParametric statisticsEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionTime complexityConnected dominating setShortest-path treeRangingBottleneckMinimum degree spanning treeDiscrete mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The result. Parametric optimization pwblems that concern graphs with continuously changing edge weights have been explored by numerous researctmrs, with moti-vation ranging fl'om sensitivity analysis to mobile-data applications. For instance, Dey [5] has shown that for an undirected graph with n vertices and m edges where the edge weights are linear functions in one parameter ("time"), the minimum spanning tree (MST) can un-dergo at most O(mn 1/3) changes (edge swaps). Agarwal et al. [1] have given data structures to maintain the MST over time, with a cost of O(n 2/3 polylog n) per change. Fernandez-Baca et al. [7] have given an algorithm to compute all changes to the MST in O(mnlog n) total time. In this note, we focus on a problem studied by Katoh and Tokuyama [8]: Given a parametric graph with edge weights changing linearly in time, find the time value when the weight of the largest MST edge (the so-called bottleneck edge) is minimized. The bottleneck edge weight is of particular interest, because it represents a threshold for connectivity: it is equal to the smallest value r such that the subgraph of edges with weight < r stays connected. For this problem, Katoh and ~Ibkuyama [8] have given an O((ms/7nU7 + mn U3) polylogn) algorithm, which is faster than the current methods for computing all MSTs over time. Katoh and Tokuyama's method uses advanced ata structures for range searching and is therefore difficult to implement. Here, we give a much faster and simpler randomized algorithm that runs in O(n(m/n)Slogn + m) expected time for any fixed ¢> 0. This time bound is at least as good as 1 O(mlogn) and O(nlog + ~ n + m) for any fixed ~ '> 0, and almost matches an fi(n log n+m) lower bound. The new result is obtained by an interesting combination of techniques from computational geometry and graph data structures. The geometric aspects are similar to those used for the problem of 2-d feasible linear programming with violations fi'om a previous paper [4].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207