MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067185306 · doi:10.1353/can.2007.0055

'Narrow-Minded People': Canadian Universities and the Academic Refugee Crises, 1933–1941

2007· article· en· W2067185306 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
David Zimmerman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeGermanPolitical scienceCorporationPublic administrationSociologyEconomic historyHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The failure of Canadian academics to aide their colleagues in Germany during the 1930s stands in stark contrast to their counterparts in Great Britain, the United States, and elsewhere. While other national academic refugee organizations were established in 1933, it was only in 1939 that Canadian academics organized the Canadian Society for the Protection of Science and Learning (CSPSL). Prior to 1939, a mere handful of displaced scholars found refuge in Canada, almost all of whom were funded by grants from the Carnegie Corporation. The success of the Carnegie program shows that there were no impenetrable barriers to academic migration, if supported by Canadian universities. By the time the CSPSL was established, it was too late to help most of those scholars still trying to escape from German-controlled Europe. The CSPSL was never particularly successful in its efforts to assist refugees, and was never able to escape the anti-Semitism that was so endemic to Canadian society both inside and outside the academy. Le fait que les professeurs d’université du Canada n’aient pas aidé leurs collègues allemands durant les années 1930, contraste grandement avec les résultats obtenus par leurs homologues en Grande-Bretagne, aux E tats-Unis et ailleurs. Tandis que les organismes d’accueil de professeurs réfugiés s’établissent dans ces pays dès 1933, ce n’est qu’en 1939 qu’est fondée la Canadian Society for the Protection of Science and Learning (CSPSL). Avant 1939, seulement quelques érudits trouvent refuge au Canada, principalement gràce à des bourses de la Carnegie Corporation. Le succès du programme Carnegie montre qu’il n’y avait aucun obstacle insurmontable à la migration de professeurs, quand elle était soutenue par des universités canadiennes. Au moment où la CSPSL a été mise en place, il était trop tard pour venir en aide aux érudits qui tentaient encore de fuir l’Europe occupée par les Allemands. La CSPSL n’a jamais vraiment réussi à aider les réfugiés, pas plus qu’elle n’a réussi à échapper au courant antisémite qui s’est installé dans la société canadienne, dans les universités comme à l’extérieur de celles-ci.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207