MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067193131 · doi:10.1103/physreve.81.021601

Diffusion-limited and advection-driven electrodeposition in a microfluidic channel

2010· article· en· W2067193131 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Wlasenko, Fatemeh Soltani, Dennis Zakopcan, David Sinton, G. M. Steeves

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodeAnodeMaterials scienceElectrodeElectric fieldMicrofluidicsTaperingMechanicsDiffusionFlow (mathematics)ElectrochemistryNanotechnologyEtching (microfabrication)Chemical physicsThermodynamicsElectrical engineeringChemistryPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-terminating electrochemical fabrication was used within a microfluidic channel to create a junction between two Au electrodes separated by a gap of 75 microm . During the electrochemical process of etching from the anode to deposition at the cathode, flow could be applied in the anode-to-cathode direction. Without applied flow, dendritic growth and dense branching morphologies were typically observed at the cathode. The addition of applied flow resulted in a densely packed gold structure that filled the channel. A computer simulation was developed to explore regimes where the diffusion, flow, and electric field between the electrodes individually dominated growth. The model provided good qualitative agreement relating flow to the experimental results. The model was also used to contrast the effects of open and closed boundaries and electric field strength, as factors related to tapering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207