Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: ALS severely affects families, who have to cope after the patient's death. There is no information on ongoing needs or concerns of families surviving the death of the ALS patient. We wished to survey these needs. METHOD: We developed a written questionnaire which we distributed at a single point in time to 32 patients' families. All patients had been followed in the McMaster University ALS clinic, and had died months to years earlier from ALS. RESULTS: The response rate was excellent (85%). ALS caused lasting emotional and financial hardship in families, and 37% of respondents felt they were coping poorly, sometimes years after the patient's death. This did not clearly relate to the bereavement period, nor to the physical or financial impact of the disease during life. In most cases the disease led to a strengthening of family ties. However, 15% of chief caregivers felt blamed by in-laws for contributing to the death of the patient; in these cases family ties weakened. Less than half of families were still receiving ALS information, although 75% still wished to. About two-thirds of families had ongoing questions about the disease, and a small number remained concerned that they, or their children, would develop the disease. Only a third of families were actively involved in ongoing fund-raising activities. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to survey ongoing family needs after the death of the ALS patient. ALS causes lasting impact in surviving family members. There are ongoing needs that could be met by ALS clinics, ALS organizations, and healthcare systems, and opportunities for greater involvement of family members in volunteer activities, awareness, and fundraising. Generalization across other healthcare systems, and comparison with other disease states, could be important.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".