MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067255990 · doi:10.1145/500141.500221

Experiences with MPEG-4 multimedia streaming

2001· article· en· W2067255990 on OpenAlexaff
Hassan Shojania, Baochun Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTestbedMultimediaReal Time Streaming ProtocolCodecQuality of serviceComputer networkWireless Multimedia ExtensionsThe InternetWirelessWireless networkTelecommunicationsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advent of next-generation multimedia technologies such as very-low bit rate MPEG-4 codec, multimedia streaming of high-quality video and audio has become a near-term reality. The high compression ratio and error resilience offered by the MPEG-4 standard promise near-term popularity for rich contents and exceptional quality to consumers over affordable Internet connections, such as xDSL, cable modem and 3G wireless networks. Audio and video streaming applications are at the center of such scenarios; and Quality-of-Service (QoS) support in such applications is critical to their widespread acceptance.To the best of our knowledge, there has been no existing open-source MPEG-4 multimedia streaming applications in the academic community, which leads to the lack of research results using MPEG-4 streaming, especially with respect to Quality-of-Service support. In this work, we have implemented an open-source MPEG-4 multimedia streaming testbed in IP-based networks. In this paper, we show our experiences and lessons learned with such a testbed. First, we describe the algorithms and solutions used in our implemention testbed, emphasizing several critical issues. Second, through extensive experiments, we demonstrate measurements of bandwidth requirements and data loss for streaming a set of multimedia samples with different bit rates over UDP, which is ubiquitously available in the TCP/IP protocol stack on all consumer operating systems. Finally, future work for further improvements is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207