MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067285486 · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31821b2037

Solitary Fibrous Tumors Arising From the Female Pelvis

2011· article· en· W2067285486 on OpenAlexaff
Thanasak Sueblinvong, Patricia L. Judson, Levi S. Downs, Peter A. Argenta

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrics and Gynecology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSoft tissue tumor case studies
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolitary fibrous tumorMedicineAdjuvant therapyMesenchymal TumorDiseaseFemale pelvisPelvisAdjuvantFemale circumcisionRadiologyPathologySurgeryOncologyChemotherapyGynecologyImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Solitary fibrous tumor is a rare mesenchymal tumor reported initially in the pleura but that is now reported in widely ranging anatomic sites with a variable clinical course. Solitary fibrous tumor arising from the female genital tract is extremely rare and the management of this condition is controversial. CASES: We report three cases of female genital tract solitary fibrous tumors displaying different clinical behaviors and review literature with regard to diagnosis, possible prognostic factors, and management of this tumor. CONCLUSION: The primary treatment of this disease should be surgical. The rarity and disparate clinical manifestations of this disease preclude a definitive statement on use and optimization of adjuvant therapy. Nevertheless, both pathologic and clinical findings may be useful in gauging risk and assessing the merits of individualized adjuvant therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrics and GynecologySame topicSoft tissue tumor case studiesFrench-language works237,207