MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067295648 · doi:10.1139/b02-101

Characterization of an<i>Avena</i>isolate of<i>Magnaporthe grisea</i>and identification of a locus conditioning its specificity on oat

2002· article· en· W2067295648 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hong-Sik Oh, Yukio Tosa, N. Takabayashi, Shoji Nakagawa, Reiko Tomita, Le Dinh DON, Motoaki Kusaba, Hitoshi Nakayashiki, S. Mayama

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAvenaBiologyMagnaporthe griseaLocus (genetics)BotanyOryza sativaMagnaportheGenetic analysisPopulationGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An isolate of Magnaporthe grisea was collected from a blast lesion on oat in Brazil. Sequence analysis of the rDNA-ITS-2 region and DNA fingerprinting with repetitive elements revealed that the Avena isolate belongs to the "crop isolate group" and is similar to Triticum isolates. At high temperature (28°C), the Avena isolate caused severe disease symptoms on primary leaves of oat and wheat. When the temperature was decreased to 20°C, wheat leaves expressed resistance to the Avena isolate. Cytologically, this temperature-dependent resistance was associated with an increase in the incidences of papilla formation and a hypersensitive reaction. Pathogenicity tests with various plant species at 20°C revealed that the Avena isolate is exclusively parasitic on oat. To elucidate genetic mechanisms of this species-specific parasitism, the Avena isolate was crossed with a Triticum isolate and resulting F 1 progenies were subjected to pathogenicity tests on oat seedlings. In the F 1 population, avirulent and virulent cultures segregated in a 1:1 ratio, suggesting that the specific parasitism on oat is controlled by a single gene. This locus was designated as Pat1.Key words: Magnaporthe grisea, species-specific parasitism, oat, temperature sensitive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207