MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067323349 · doi:10.1021/jo015624h

Synthesis of (±)-Bakkenolide-A and Its C-7, C-10, and C-7,10 Epimers by Means of an Intramolecular Diels−Alder Reaction

2001· article· en· W2067323349 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas G. Back, Víctor Oswaldo Nava-Salgado, Joseph E. Payne

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAkademie Věd České Republiky
KeywordsChemistryIntramolecular forceCycloadditionMalonateIntramolecular reactionEpimerMedicinal chemistryAlkylationPropargyl bromideDiels–Alder reactionMethyleneStereochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(+/-)-bakkenolide-A (1) was prepared in five steps from ethyl 4-benzyloxyacetoacetate by sequential alkylations with tiglyl bromide and (Z)-5-bromo-1,3-pentadiene, followed by an intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction of (E,Z)-triene 25b as the key step. The hydrindane cycloadduct 28 was subjected to hydrogenation and spontaneous or acid-catalyzed lactonization, followed by a Witttig reaction to introduce the exocyclic methylene group of 1. The known 7-epibakkenolide-A (2) and novel 10-epi- and 7,10-diepibakkenolide-A (3 and 4, respectively) stereoisomers were obtained as minor byproducts. When (E)-5-bromo-1,3-pentadiene was used instead of the Z-isomer, the 10-epi- and 7,10-diepibakkenolides were the major products. In both cases exo cyclization was preferred over endo. An alternative approach was based on a similar intramolecular Diels-Alder cycloaddition, using dimethyl malonate instead of ethyl 4-benzyloxyacetoacetate as the starting material for the double alkylation preceding the cycloaddition step. The cycloadduct was then converted into the corresponding alpha-phenylseleno propargyl esters 16 or 22. However, attempted formation of the spiro center by a radical cyclization resulted chiefly in reductive deselenization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae StudiesFrench-language works237,207