Sci‐Sat AM(2): Brachy‐04: Spectral and dosimetric study of the Xoft electronic brachytherapy system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Axxent developed by Xoft Inc. is a miniature x‐ray tube capable of generating a 50 kVp x‐ray spectrum with dose‐rates suitable for HDR applications. Results of spectral measurements compared with Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations have been published. This study is a continuation of previous work with shifting emphasis towards dosimetric characterization of the miniature x‐ray tube. Dose distributions using EBT Gafchromic films agree to within 10 % of Geant4 results. In addition, TG‐43 parameters can be calculated. However, consideration should be given to the biological effectiveness of the spectrum at different depths. Spectral measurements show significant beam hardening with 1st HVL increasing from 0.55 to 1.20 mm Al after 11.50 mm of water filtration. This effect may be attributed to the significant loss of low energy characteristic photons. Furthermore, the degree of beam hardening is dependent of the material, with 1st HVLs of 1.20 and 1.03 mm Al after 11.50 mm of water and Lucite respectively. The biological effect is quantified by calculating the number of single and double strand breaks. The number of strand breaks for the 50 kVp x‐ray spectrum is similar to that of I‐125 radiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".