On the functional decomposition of multivariate laurent polynomials (abstract only)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Determining whether a univariate polynomial may be written as the functional composition of two others of lower degree is a question that has been studied since at least the work of Ritt [1]. Algorithms by Barton and Zippel [2] and then by Kozen and Landau [3] have been incorporated in many computer algebra systems. Generalizations have been studied for functional decomposition of rational functions [4], algebraic functions [5], multivariate polynomials [6] and univariate Laurent polynomials [7]. We explore the functional decomposition problem for multivariate Laurent polynomials, considering the case f = g o h where g is univariate and h may be multivariate. We present an algorithm to find such a decomposition if it exists. The algorithm proceeds as follows: First, a variable weighting is chosen to make the weighted degree zero term in f constant. The positive degree and negative degree parts of h are then reconstructed separately, in a manner similar to that of Kozen and Landau, but by treating the homogeneous collections of terms by grade rather than individual monomials. Then terms of the univariate polynomial g are reconstructed degree by degree using a generic univariate projection of h.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it