MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mutational analysis of F‐pilin reveals domains for pilus assembly, phage infection and DNA transfer

2002· article· en· W2067402889 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Manchak, Karen Anthony, Laura S. Frost

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPilusPilinBiologyDNAMutantBacteriophageGeneticsMicrobiologyEscherichia coliGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The F-pilus has been implicated in recipient cell recognition during the establishment of a stable mating pair before conjugation as well as forming part of the conjugative pore for DNA transfer. The F-pilus is the site of attachment of the filamentous phages (M13, f1 and fd), which attach to the F-pilus tip, and the RNA phages, R17 and Qbeta, which attach to different sites exposed on the sides of the pilus. R17 has been shown to undergo eclipse, or capsid release, outside the cell on pili attached to cells. New and existing mutants of traA combined with natural variants of F-pilin were assayed for pilin stability and processing, pilus elongation, transfer, phage sensitivity and R17 eclipse. Phenotypes of these mutants indicated that the F-pilin subunit contains specific regions that can be associated with pilus assembly, phage sensitivity and DNA transport. Mutations involving lysines and phenylalanines within residues 45-60 suggest that these residues might participate in transmitting a signal down the length of the pilus that initiates DNA transfer or R17 eclipse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207