MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067454514 · doi:10.1063/1.2353880

Conditional statistics for a passive scalar with a mean gradient and intermittency

2006· article· en· W2067454514 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Bourlioux, Andrew J. Majda, Oleg Volkov

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntermittencyPhysicsScalar (mathematics)Statistical physicsPéclet numberStatisticsGaussianProbability density functionProbability distributionConditional probability distributionMathematical analysisMathematicsMechanicsQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conditional dissipation and diffusion for a passive scalar with an imposed mean gradient are studied here. The results are obtained for an elementary model consisting of a random shear flow with a simple time-periodic transverse sweep. As the Peclet number is increased, scalar intermittency is observed; the scalar probability density function departs strongly from a Gaussian law. As a result, the conditional dissipation undergoes a transition from a quadratic behavior for the near-Gaussian probability distribution case at low Peclet number to a more complex shape at large Peclet. The conditional diffusion also undergoes a transition, this time from a linear to a nonlinear dependence, for cases with sufficient intermittency as well as a significant contribution from multiple spatial modes. The present analysis sheds some light on similar behaviors observed recently in numerical simulations of more complex models. The statistics in the present study are obtained by exact processing of one-dimensional quadrature results so that all sampling errors are eliminated, including in the tails of the distribution. This allows for a quantification of typical sampling errors when the conditional statistics are processed from numerical databases. The robustness of models based on polynomial fits for the conditional statistics is also assessed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207