MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067469192 · doi:10.1029/2005jc003168

Predicting the frequency of storm surges and extreme sea levels in the northwest Atlantic

2006· article· en· W2067469192 on OpenAlexafffund
Natacha B. Bernier, Keith R. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHindcastTide gaugeStorm surgeClimatologyEnvironmental scienceReturn periodStormSea levelSurgeBarotropic fluidStandard deviationGeologyOceanographyMeteorologyGeographyStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 40 year hindcast of storm surges in the northwest Atlantic and adjacent shelf seas is performed using a 2‐D nonlinear barotropic ocean model forced by realistic 6 hourly winds and air pressures. This hindcast is used to generate spatial maps of the return level of storm surges and also to estimate the return period of extreme total sea levels. The accuracy of the hindcast is assessed in two ways. First, the standard deviation of the difference between the observed residuals (total sea level minus tide) and the hindcast is calculated at 24 tide gauge locations. A typical error standard deviation is 8 cm. Second, the 40 year return level of observed residuals is compared to that of the hindcast surges. The predicted 40 year return levels are typically within 10 cm of observed return levels at the 24 observation locations. A spatial map of the 40 year return level of surges is presented for the northwest Atlantic. It identifies the regions exposed to the largest surges. Total sea levels are reconstructed using (1) the hindcast surges and (2) tides and higher‐frequency variability predicted from short, observed sea level records. An extremal analysis of the reconstructed total sea levels shows that their 40 year return levels are in good agreement (within about 10 cm) with the levels calculated from multidecadal observed sea level records. This means that given a short record anywhere within the model domain, or results from a good tidal model, 40 year return levels can be estimated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207