MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067559892 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.31479

Core binding factor beta (<i>CBFB</i>) haploinsufficiency due to an interstitial deletion at 16q21q22 resulting in delayed cranial ossification, cleft palate, congenital heart anomalies, and feeding difficulties but favorable outcome

2006· article· en· W2067559892 on OpenAlexaff
R. Katherine Hyde, Amalia Dutra, Patrick Mohide, Paul Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBone Metabolism and Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University Medical CentreMcMaster UniversityMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaploinsufficiencyOssificationCleidocranial DysplasiaCore binding factorRUNX2MedicineSkullDysplasiaPathologyAnatomyBiologyGeneticsPhenotypeGeneTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The core binding factor beta gene (CBFB), essential to bone morphogenesis, is located at 16q22.1. Homozygous deficiency of CBFB leads to ossification defects in mice. CBFB forms a heterodimer with RUNX2 (CBFA1) during embryonic bone development. RUNX2 mutations lead to cleidocranial dysplasia in humans. We describe an infant boy with an interstitial deletion of 16q21q22, delayed skull ossification, cleft palate, and heart anomalies who had a difficult course in infancy but eventually improved and is healthy. He was found to have CBFB haploinsufficiency, but did not have mutations in RUNX2. We suggest that 16q21q22 deletion be considered when there are antenatal or postnatal findings of enlarged cranial sutures with or without cleft palate. The finding of CBFB haploinsufficiency in our case and the similarity of cranial ossification defects with a mouse model of CBFB deletion suggest a role for CBFB in cranial bone development in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicBone Metabolism and DiseasesFrench-language works237,207