MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067560183 · doi:10.1063/1.2338320

On the mechanism of anion desorption from DNA induced by low energy electrons

2006· article· en· W2067560183 on OpenAlexafffund
Sylwia Ptasińska, Léon Sanche

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDesorptionChemistryIonElectronDissociation (chemistry)MoleculeFragmentation (computing)DNAOligonucleotideChemical physicsAtomic physicsPhotochemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our knowledge of the mechanisms of radiation damage to DNA induced by secondary electrons is still very limited, mainly due to the large sizes of the system involved and the complexity of the interactions. To reduce the problem to its simplest form, we investigated specific electron interactions with one of the most simple model system of DNA, an oligonucleotide tetrameter compound of the four bases. We report anion desorption yields from a thin solid film of the oligonucleotide GCAT induced by the impact of 3-15 eV electrons. All observed anions (H-, O-, OH-, CN-, and OCN-) are produced by dissociative electron attachment to the molecule, which results in desorption peaks between 6 and 12 eV. Above 14 eV nonresonant dipolar dissociation dominates the desorption yields. By comparing the shapes and relative intensities of the anion yield functions from GCAT physisorbed on a tantalum substrate with those obtained from isolated DNA basic subunits (i.e., bases, deoxyribose, and phosphate groups) from either the gas phase or condensed phase experiments, it is possible to obtain more details on the mechanisms involved in low energy electron damage to DNA, particularly on those producing single strand breaks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207