Where Polarity Meets Fusion: Role of Par6 in Trophoblast Differentiation during Placental Development and Preeclampsia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trophoblast cell fusion is a prerequisite for proper human placental development. Herein we examined the contribution of Par6 (Partitioning defective protein 6), a key regulator of cell polarity, to trophoblast cell fusion in human placental development. During early placentation, Par6 localized to nuclei of cytotrophoblast cells but with advancing gestation Par6 shifted its localization to the cytoplasm and apical brush border of the syncytium. Exposure of primary isolated trophoblasts to 3% O(2) resulted in elevated Par6 expression, maintenance of tight junction marker ZO-1 at cell boundaries, and decreased fusogenic syncytin 1 expression compared with cells cultured at 20% O(2). Treatment of choriocarcinoma BeWo cells with forskolin, a known inducer of fusion, increased syncytin 1 expression but decreased that of Par6 and ZO-1. Par6 overexpression in the presence of forskolin maintained ZO-1 at cell boundaries while decreasing syncytin 1 levels. In contrast, silencing of Par6 disrupted ZO-1 localization at cell boundaries and altered the expression and distribution of acetylated α-tubulin. Par6 expression was elevated in preeclamptic placentas relative to normotensive preterm controls and Par6 located to trophoblast cells expressing ZO-1. Together, our data indicate that Par6 negatively regulates trophoblast fusion via its roles on tight junctions and cytoskeleton dynamics and provide novel insight into the contribution of this polarity marker in altered trophoblast cell fusion typical of preeclampsia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".