Integrated Cardiovascular Function in the Conscious Streptozotocin-Diabetic Deoxycorticosterone-Acetate-Hypertensive Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blood pressure, heart rate, and left ventricular function were measured in conscious diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to 5 weeks of deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA) treatment which was started 1 week following intravenous injection of streptozotocin (STZ) (60 mg/kg) to induce diabetes mellitus. It was found that chronic administration of DOCA in nondiabetic animals caused an increase in blood pressure and functional parameters of left ventricle, and a decrease in heart rate and plasma insulin levels. Normotensive diabetic rats exhibited hyperglycemia, hypoinsulinemia, and a lower body weight as compared with control animals but did not show significant abnormalities in cardiovascular function. DOCA-hypertensive STZ-diabetic rats had similar hyperglycemia, milder hypoinsulinemia, and a significantly lower rate of left ventricular relaxation and systolic blood pressure compared with the nondiabetic DOCA-hypertensive animals. It is concluded that the addition of DOCA hypertension to intact 6-week STZ-diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats results in the occurrence of cardiac dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".