Molecular determinants of the inhibition of human Kv1.5 potassium currents by external protons and Zn<sup>2+</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using human Kv1.5 channels expressed in HEK293 cells we assessed the ability of H+o to mimic the previously reported action of Zn(2+) to inhibit macroscopic hKv1.5 currents, and using site-directed mutagenesis, we addressed the mechanistic basis for the inhibitory effects of H(+)(o) and Zn(2+). As with Zn(2+), H(+)(o) caused a concentration-dependent, K(+)(o)-sensitive and reversible reduction of the maximum conductance (g(max)). With zero, 5 and 140 mM K(+)(o) the pK(H) for this decrease of g(max) was 6.8, 6.2 and 6.0, respectively. The concentration dependence of the block relief caused by increasing [K(+)](o) was well fitted by a non-competitive interaction between H(+)(o) and K(+)(o), for which the K(D) for the K(+) binding site was 0.5-1.0 mM. Additionally, gating current analysis in the non-conducting mutant hKv1.5 W472F showed that changing from pH 7.4 to pH 5.4 did not affect Q(max) and that charge immobilization, presumed to be due to C-type inactivation, was preserved at pH 5.4. Inhibition of hKv1.5 currents by H+o or Zn(2+) was substantially reduced by a mutation either in the channel turret (H463Q) or near the pore mouth (R487V). In light of the requirement for R487, the homologue of Shaker T449, as well as the block-relieving action of K(+)(o), we propose that H(+) or Zn(2+) binding to histidine residues in the pore turret stabilizes a channel conformation that is most likely an inactivated state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".