MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067678991 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2010.5627187

Real time MRI prostate segmentation based on wavelet multiscale products flow tracking

2010· article· en· W2067678991 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Flores‐Tapia, Niranjan Venugopal, Gabriel Thomas, B McCurdy, Lawrence Ryner, Stephen Pistorius

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of ManitobaCancerCare Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerComputer scienceWaveletSegmentationProstateArtificial intelligenceMagnetic resonance imagingData setImage segmentationComputer visionProcess (computing)Wavelet transformTracking (education)Noise (video)Pattern recognition (psychology)RadiologyMedicineCancerImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, prostate cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men in North America. As with many others types of cancer, early detection and treatment greatly increases the patient's chance of survival. Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopic Imaging (MRI/MRSI) techniques have became a reliable tool for early stage prostate cancer detection. Nevertheless, their performance is strongly affected by the determination of the region of interest (ROI) prior to data acquisition process. The process of executing prostate MRI/MRSI techniques can be significantly enhanced by segmenting the whole prostate. A novel method for segmentation of the prostate in MRI datasets is presented. This method exploits the different behavior presented by signal singularities and noise in the wavelet domain in order to accurately detect the borders around the prostate. The prostate contour is then traced by using a set of spatially variant rules that are based on prior knowledge about the general shape of the prostate. The proposed method yielded promising results when applied to clinical datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207