MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067694805 · doi:10.1160/th04-04-0228

Association between the Thr715Pro P-selectin gene polymorphism and soluble P-selectin levels in a multiethnic population in South London

2004· article· en· W2067694805 on OpenAlexaff
Sally Kerry, Yanbin Dong, Pasquale Strazzullo, Francesco P. Cappuccio, Michelle A. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueThrombosis and Haemostasis · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Population and Public Health
FundersBritish Heart FoundationWellcome Trust
KeywordsInternal medicineMedicineGenotypeAllelePolymorphism (computer science)Diabetes mellitusGene polymorphismEndocrinologyGastroenterologyGeneticsGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim was to investigate whether the Thr715Pro P-selectin polymorphism is associated with soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) levels in individuals from different ethnic groups. Plasma sP-selectin and Thr715Pro (A/C) P-selectin gene polymorphism were measured in 237 white (106 females), 177 black African origin (92 females) and 201 South Asian (94 females) individuals living in England. All were free from coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and other cardiovascular disease, diabetes, drug therapy for hypertension or high lipids, hormone replacement therapy or oral contraceptive pill. The Thr715Pro C allele was rare in blacks (0.8%) and intermediate in South Asians (3.0%) compared to whites (11.2%; p <0.001). sP-selectin levels were significantly lower in the individuals with the AC or CC compared to the AA genotype in both whites (-25% (95% C.I. -33.3 to -16.9); p <0.001) and South Asians (-25.2% (-40.5 to -6.1); p <0.012). There was insufficient power for this analysis in blacks. In conclusion, in whites and South Asians the C allele of the Thr715Pro P-selectin polymorphism is associated with lower sP-selectin levels. Lower levels of sP-selectin were not accounted for by this polymorphism in blacks, in whom the C allele was very rare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThrombosis and HaemostasisSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207