MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067722084 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.1494

Mosaic trisomy of a small r(1) with an abnormal phenotype

2001· article· en· W2067722084 on OpenAlexaff
Angelika J. Dawson, David Konkin, D. Riordan, Albert E. Chudley

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupernumeraryEuchromatinFluorescence in situ hybridizationKaryotypeBiologyGeneticsRing chromosomeSmall supernumerary marker chromosomeTrisomyAneuploidyChromosomePhenotypeX chromosomeHeterochromatinMarker chromosomeCytogeneticsAnatomyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cytogenetic studies of a mildly dysmorphic 10-year-old male with mild developmental delay and learning difficulties revealed mosaicism for a supernumerary ring chromosome in approximately half of the cells. The karyotype of this patient was established as 47,XY,+r[15]/46,XY[15].ish r(1)(D1Z7+,wcp1-). Although the presence of euchromatic material was shown by C banding, the lack of hybridization with the whole chromosome paint 1 (wcp1) probe suggests that few unique sequences are contained in the ring and that these sequences likely explain the child's dysmorphic features and developmental delay. A review of the literature, including the present case, suggests that the significance of euchromatin in supernumerary r(1) as determined by both C banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome 1 painting probes can be used as a prognostic indicator for potential severity of the clinical phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical GeneticsSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207