Tetraphosphinitoresorcinarene Complexes: Cationic Silver(I) and Copper(I) Halide Complexes as Mercurate(II) Anion Receptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reactions of mercury(II) halides with the tetraphosphinitoresorcinarene complexes [P4M5X5], where M=Cu or Ag, X=Cl, Br, or I, and P4=(PhCH2CH2CHC6H2)4(O2CR)4(OPPh2)4 with R=C6H11, 4-C6H4Me, C4H3S, OCH2CCH, or OCH2Ph, have been studied. The reactions of the complexes with HgX2 when M=Ag and X=Cl or Br occur with elimination of silver(I) halide and formation of [P4Ag2X(HgX3)], but when M=Ag and X=I, the complexes [P4Ag4I5(HgI)] are formed. When M=Cu and X=I, the products were the remarkable capsule complexes [(P4Cu2I)2(Hg2X6)]. When M=Ag and X=I, the reaction with both CuI and HgI2 gave the complexes [P4Cu2I(Hg2I5)]. Many of these complexes are structurally characterized as containing mercurate anions weakly bonded to cationic tetraphosphinitoresorcinarene complexes of copper(I) or silver(I) in an unusual form of host-guest interaction. In contrast, the complex [P4Ag4I5(HgI)] is considered to be derived from an anionic silver cluster with an iodomercury(II) cation. Fluxionality of the complexes in solution is interpreted in terms of easy, reversible making and breaking of secondary bonds between the copper(I) or silver(I) cations and the mercurate anions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".