Paradoxical Cyclosporine A Requirements in Pediatric Renal Transplants Receiving High‐Dose Steroids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potent immunosuppressant cyclosporine A (CyA) is a mainstay of treatment in the renal transplant population. During episodes of acute allograft rejection, therapy also includes the pulse administration of high-dose steroids such as prednisone or methylprednisolone. Both steroids and CyA are metabolized by the CYP3A4 isoenzyme of the cytochrome P450 catalytic system. On a theoretical basis, high steroid concentrations during a rejection episode could competitively inhibit CyA metabolism, increasing its systemic concentration and decreasing its dose requirements. A database was compiled consisting of pediatric patients who had undergone an acute renal rejection event during the years 1993 to 2003. The severity of rejection events, as well as the CyA and prednisone dosing regimens used during rejection, were assessed using a comprehensive chart analysis. The presence or absence of additional medications that could potentially interact with CyA was also examined. Although some patients responded in the predicted manner, the authors also found that a subgroup of pediatric patients placed on highdose pulse steroid therapy for acute graft rejection required increased amounts of CyA to maintain therapeutic concentrations. The authors recommend monitoring of patients on high-dose steroids for paradoxical CyA requirements intermittently during high-dose steroid treatment to individualize CyA therapy appropriately during renal allograft rejection and thereby maximize efficacy while minimizing potential toxic side effects of CyA such as under-immunosuppression and organ rejection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".