MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long‐term efficacy and safety of alfuzosin 10 mg once daily: a 2‐year experience in ‘real‐life’ practice

2005· article· en· W2067869120 on OpenAlexaff
Mostafa Elhilali, Mark Emberton, Haim Matzkin, R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar, R. Härtung, Niels Harving, Antonio Alcaraz, Guy Vallancien

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Urology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlfuzosinMedicineInternational Prostate Symptom ScoreLower urinary tract symptomsNocturiaAdverse effectUrologyPopulationSexual functionQuality of life (healthcare)TamsulosinClinical endpointErectile dysfunctionInternal medicinePhysical therapyProstateHyperplasiaRandomized controlled trialUrinary system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To assess the 2-year efficacy and safety of alfuzosin 10 mg once daily, a selective alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist, in men complaining of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), in 'real life' practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 839 European men with LUTS (mean age 67.3 years) were enrolled by general practitioners in a 2-year open-label study with alfuzosin 10 mg once daily. They were asked to complete the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), its appended eighth question (bother score), and the five domains (sexual drive, erection, ejaculation, problem assessment, and overall satisfaction) of the Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory (BSFI). The results were analysed at the endpoint in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: At the endpoint the total IPSS improved by 7 points (-38.5%) from baseline (P < 0.001) with 76.9% and 49.7% of men having an improvement of > or = 3 points and >6 points, respectively. There were also significant improvements in nocturia (-0.9, -30%; P < 0.001) and bother score (-1.8, -43%; P < 0.001) from baseline. Most patients (56%) perceived symptom relief within the first 2 weeks of treatment. All BSFI domains significantly improved from baseline (P < 0.05; <0.001 for overall satisfaction) and these improvements were more marked in men with severe LUTS at baseline. Alfuzosin 10 mg was well tolerated; the most common adverse event related to vasodilatation was dizziness/postural dizziness (3.1%). Ejaculatory disorders were uncommon (0.3%). Changes in blood pressure remained marginal, including in elderly men and those receiving antihypertensive agents. CONCLUSIONS: Alfuzosin 10 mg administered for 2 years in real practice is effective in improving LUTS and quality of life, and is well tolerated from a cardiovascular perspective, including in elderly men and those receiving antihypertensive co-medication. Ejaculatory disorders are uncommon. Alfuzosin may even slightly improve various domains of sexual function, such as sexual drive, erection, ejaculation and satisfaction with sexual life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of UrologySame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207