MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067907663 · doi:10.2495/sdp-v9-n5-669-679

Study on biomass tar reduction by ash and fluidizing medium in a heterogeneous reaction

2014· article· en· W2067907663 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qingyue Wang, T. Endo, P. Aparu, H. Kurogawa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Keywordstar (computing)PyrolysisBiomass (ecology)Thermal decompositionWaste managementCombustionDecompositionChemical engineeringFossil fuelChemistryThermal conductivity detectorGas chromatographyMaterials scienceEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryOrganic chemistryChromatographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since fossil energy resources are exhaustible in the world, renewable biomass is considered as one of the useful future resources for energy and materials.In addition, when the biomass grows, it can contribute to the prevention of global warming by circularly absorbing CO 2 .There are different biomass utilization technologies such as the pyrolysis and gasifi cation, fermentation and combustion.For example, gaseous components are used as chemical products and used for energy production; these can be produced by the pyrolysis or synthesized by gasifi cation.However, there is the problem that condensable organic compounds, so-called 'tar' will also be generated during the pyrolysis and gasifi cation processes.Most of the tar components are present as gases at higher temperature inside of the reactors.However, a black oily liquid will be formed, leading to the equipment failure when the temperature is cooled down lower than their boiling points.Therefore, appropriate processing is required.As a processing method, catalytic decomposition of tar has been widely studied.In the present study, it was carried out for the thermal decomposition of cellulose in the experimental apparatus connecting two reaction tubes.Tar and gases generated by the thermal decomposition of cellulose in the fi rst reactor can be pyrolyzed with catalytic cracking in the second reactor.Tar contents were fi rstly cooled and collected.At the same time, the amount of gases was measured by a gas chromatograph with a fl ame ionization detector and a gas chromatograph with a thermal conductivity detector.Then, K and Ca were selected as the catalyst of alkali metals and alkaline earth metals contained in the waste biomass, which were present in the state of oxide or carbonate during the pyrolysis and gasifi cation.The amount of condensable products was decreased by installing catalytic contents of K 2 CO 3 and Ca(OH) 2 .Additionally, the amount of gaseous products was increased.It can be concluded that an alkali metal compound (K 2 CO 3 ) and an alkaline earth compound (CaO) have a catalytic effect to decompose tar contents, which can enhance gaseous production in the secondary reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesFrench-language works237,207