MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067935281 · doi:10.4103/1947-2714.117321

Central nervous system and Cryptococcus neoformans

2013· article· en· W2067935281 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
VeronicaA Gaona-Flores

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American Journal of Medical Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryptococcus neoformansCryptococcosisCryptococcusCryptococcus gattiiMeningoencephalitisMedicineMicrobiologyImmunologyLatex fixation testBiologyPathologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cryptococcus neoformans continues to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality, and is the most common central nervous system (CNS) mycosis in immunocompromised patients, in particular those with AIDS. C. neoformans has also increased in immunocompromised transplant patients,[1,2,3,4] and is a systemic mycosis. The incidence of infection due to C. neoformans varies among continents. C. neoformans is a form of yeast with biochemical, antigenic, and epidemiological differences. There are two known varieties. Most infections are due to C. neoformans var. grubii and a lesser number due to C. gattii (Africa, Australia, Canada, Latin America). Clinical presentations also depend on the characteristics of the immunological competency of the patients. In general, it is a systemic fungal infection with its origin as the inhalation of C. neoformans, initially affecting the lungs. Therefore, CNS manifestations are as a result of the dissemination of this fungus from the lung.[5] The polysaccharide capsule of C. neoformans is the most potent virulence factor, which also allows it to evade the immune system. Laboratory diagnosis is accomplished either by ELISA or latex agglutination test, or visualization of the capsule upon direct examination of fresh cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), in particular with China ink (India ink staining or nigrosine allows for the identification of the yeast from 4-20 mm in diameter). With this negative stain, identification of the image of the capsule and yeast in the center will be possible. When the fungal burden is high, the pseudomycelium may be observed most of the time. On other occasions it is practical to centrifuge the CSF at 3,000 rpm Χ 10 min. The sediment is useful for microscopic study and cultures. Another accessible study is latex agglutination, which identifies the A, B, C, and D serotypes that constitute the C. neoformans/C. gattii complex. Clinical correlation and suspicion of the infection are important. As in all laboratory tests, there are false negatives and false positives, thereby the importance of obtaining the CSF culture, which allows identification of the yeasts of C. neoformans. Genotypic identification proposed by the genotyping working group of C. neoformans and C. gattii selected multilocus sequence typing (MLST), which identifies structural genes.[6] Treatment has been established,[7] however, we must pay close attention not only to the diagnosis and treatment, but also to the cryptococcal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) that may present itself as clinical deterioration or as a new or recurrent presentation of cryptococcal disease after initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART), despite microbiological evidence of effective antifungal treatment.[8,9]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American Journal of Medical SciencesSame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207