Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cryptococcus neoformans continues to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality, and is the most common central nervous system (CNS) mycosis in immunocompromised patients, in particular those with AIDS. C. neoformans has also increased in immunocompromised transplant patients,[1,2,3,4] and is a systemic mycosis. The incidence of infection due to C. neoformans varies among continents. C. neoformans is a form of yeast with biochemical, antigenic, and epidemiological differences. There are two known varieties. Most infections are due to C. neoformans var. grubii and a lesser number due to C. gattii (Africa, Australia, Canada, Latin America). Clinical presentations also depend on the characteristics of the immunological competency of the patients. In general, it is a systemic fungal infection with its origin as the inhalation of C. neoformans, initially affecting the lungs. Therefore, CNS manifestations are as a result of the dissemination of this fungus from the lung.[5] The polysaccharide capsule of C. neoformans is the most potent virulence factor, which also allows it to evade the immune system. Laboratory diagnosis is accomplished either by ELISA or latex agglutination test, or visualization of the capsule upon direct examination of fresh cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), in particular with China ink (India ink staining or nigrosine allows for the identification of the yeast from 4-20 mm in diameter). With this negative stain, identification of the image of the capsule and yeast in the center will be possible. When the fungal burden is high, the pseudomycelium may be observed most of the time. On other occasions it is practical to centrifuge the CSF at 3,000 rpm Χ 10 min. The sediment is useful for microscopic study and cultures. Another accessible study is latex agglutination, which identifies the A, B, C, and D serotypes that constitute the C. neoformans/C. gattii complex. Clinical correlation and suspicion of the infection are important. As in all laboratory tests, there are false negatives and false positives, thereby the importance of obtaining the CSF culture, which allows identification of the yeasts of C. neoformans. Genotypic identification proposed by the genotyping working group of C. neoformans and C. gattii selected multilocus sequence typing (MLST), which identifies structural genes.[6] Treatment has been established,[7] however, we must pay close attention not only to the diagnosis and treatment, but also to the cryptococcal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) that may present itself as clinical deterioration or as a new or recurrent presentation of cryptococcal disease after initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART), despite microbiological evidence of effective antifungal treatment.[8,9]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".