Expression of the α5 Integrin Subunit Gene Promoter Is Positively Regulated by the Extracellular Matrix Component Fibronectin through the Transcription Factor Sp1 in Corneal Epithelial Cells in Vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accumulation of fibronectin (FN) in response to corneal epithelium injury has been postulated to turn on expression of the FN-binding integrin alpha(5)beta(1). In this work, we determined whether the activity directed by the alpha(5) gene promoter can be modulated by FN in rabbit corneal epithelial cells (RCEC). The activity driven by chloramphenicol acetyltransferase/alpha(5) promoter-bearing plasmids was drastically increased when transfected into RCEC grown on FN-coated culture dishes. The promoter sequence mediating FN responsiveness was shown to bear a perfect inverted repeat that we designated the fibronectin-responsive element (FRE). Analyses in electrophoretic mobility shift assays provided evidence that Sp1 is the predominant transcription factor binding the FRE. Its DNA binding affinity was found to be increased when RCEC are grown on FN-coated dishes. The addition of the MEK kinase inhibitor PD98059 abolished FN responsiveness suggesting that alteration in the state of phosphorylation of Sp1 likely accounts for its increased binding to the alpha(5) FRE. The FRE also proved sufficient to confer FN responsiveness to an otherwise unresponsive heterologous promoter. However, site-directed mutagenesis indicated that only the 3' half-site of the FRE was required to direct FN responsiveness. Collectively, binding of FN to its alpha(5)beta(1) integrin activates a signal transduction pathway that results in the transcriptional activation of the alpha(5) gene likely through altering the phosphorylation state of Sp1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".