MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2068046367 · doi:10.1029/2004jd004562

Peroxyacetyl nitrate photochemistry and interactions with the Arctic surface

2004· article· en· W2068046367 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Terra M. Dassau, P. B. Shepson, J. W. Bottenheim, Kevin M. Ford

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeroxyacetyl nitrateSnowSnowpackOzone depletionArcticAtmospheric sciencesAtmospheric chemistryNitrateEnvironmental scienceOzoneNOxPhotochemistryChemistryMeteorologyGeologyStratosphereOceanographyGeomorphologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) is a NOx reservoir compound that has the ability to transport NOx to remote environments, allowing for NOx photochemistry and/or deposition of nitrogen to these clean locations. Measurements of PAN have been made at Alert, Nunavut, and Summit, Greenland, aimed at understanding the impact of PAN chemistry on atmospheric nitrogen in the Arctic. These measurements show concentrations of PAN that are only slowly varying, even during ozone depletion events at polar sunrise, when free radical photochemistry is relatively active. We used a zero‐dimensional photochemical model incorporating known gas‐phase chemistry to simulate the observed behavior of PAN at Alert, Nunavut, and Summit, Greenland. The model simulations suggest a substantial net production rate for PAN over sunlit surfaces, which is inconsistent with the measured gas‐phase concentrations. These observations thus indicate a fundamental problem with our understanding of PAN chemistry in low‐temperature, snow‐covered environments. We explore the possibility that we are missing an important sink for atmospheric PAN above snow‐covered surfaces. If the loss is caused by snowpack deposition, the data result in calculated deposition velocities ranging from 0.05 to 1 cm s−1, which would represent a significant fraction of the unidentified total nitrate input to the snowpack and glacial ice at Summit, Greenland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→